Oligarch meaning

Oligarch meaning: Example, business, Greek, legal definition, Russia. Introduction. A leader in an oligarch is a definite affluent business leader with a signed contract of political influence.

Oligarch meaning: Example, business, Greek, legal definition, Russia
Oligarch meaning: Example, business, Greek, legal definition, Russia

An oligarch is one of the chosen few people who lead or affect leaders in an oligarchy, an administration in which control is held by a selected few persons or a small class of influential people.

One of the best-off oligarchies is Russia, which analysts say has been lined by one commanding oligarchy or additional since the 1400s. Approximately speaking, an oligarchy is a form of government considered by the rule of a few persons or relations. 

More specifically, the phrase was used by Greek philosopher Aristotle in disparity to aristocracy, which was an additional term to describe rule by an advantaged few. An Oligarchic has a minor group of people who hold control.

In an Oligarchic, inhabitants still cannot vote on their leaders. In a Democracy, the inhabitants hold power because they are the ones who choose the leaders.

Post-Soviet business oligarchs comprise relatives or close connections of government administrators, government officials, and illegal bosses frequently linked to the Russian administration.

Example: Oligarch meaning

A few examples of contemporary oligarchies are Russia, Iran, China, and maybe the United States. Oligarchy occurs in different events such as aristocracy, plutocracy, kratocracy, timocracy, stratocracy, meritocracy, Geniocracy, nomocracy, theocracy, kritarchy technocracy, and patriocracy.

There are several examples of Oligarch which are discussed here and given below:

The Earliest Greece Oligarchy samples are Greek city-states like Athens and Sparta lined by collections of wealthy men with collective power like a king. These Oligarchs used their ability to improve the lives of the rich but overlooked the ordinary people’s requirements. 

Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth example is Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth only continued until 1795. But throughout its history, this republic was ruled by the Szlachta, a well-off ruling class expressing its history. This country was rich but unnoticed the ordinary people’s requirements.

South Africa sample between 1948 and 1994, South Africa was measured by the national party made up of white persons. White persons had oligarchic authority over the country and were the only ones permitted to vote. It was also known as Apartheid. America-Liberian Oligarchy example, below the same note as Apartheid, Liberia had an oligarchy of Americo-Liberians lined over numerous communities. 

The elite ran the country for multiple years. In modern Oligarchy countries, if you thought oligarchies were a thing of the past, you would be unhappily incorrect. There are numerous examples of up-to-date oligarchies everywhere in the world.


A business oligarch is usually a business magnate who controls sufficient assets to affect national politics. A business leader can be measured as an oligarch if the following circumstances are satisfied.

More commonly, an oligarch is a “member of an oligarch; a person who is part of a small assembly holding power in a state.” A trade leader can be measured as an oligarch if the following situations are gratified:

  • Uses unchallenged tactics to dictate an industry.
  • Possesses adequate political power to encourage their interests.
  • Controls numerous skills, which intensively organize their doings.


It originates from the Greek oligarchía and is molded from oligo-, meaning “few,” and -archy, meaning “rule” The word oligarchy does not suggest a specific political policy or philosophy.

The Oligarch has Greek origins and comes from oligos for “few” and arching “to rule.” When an oligarchy rules a nation, power isn’t in the needles of one person or the people but a small set of persons. An oligarch can be a supporter of dignity or a well-off person.

Traditional Greek Oligarchy systematically reconsiders a significant but ignored form of the earliest Greek administration, the “rule of the few.” Matthew Simonton trials academic orthodoxy by presenting that oligarchy was not the default mode of politics from time long-established, but in its place arose together with and in response to equality. 

He establishes for the first time how oligarchies sustained power in the face of potential citizen fights. The book claims that oligarchs considered distinguishing political organizations such as intra-oligarchic power distributing, targeted suppression, and rewards for informers to prevent cooperative action amongst the mainstream inhabitants while supporting cooperation within their levels.

Simonton draws on current communal science research on authoritarianism to simplify the mechanisms of oligarchic organizations. Like up-to-date authoritarian commands, ancient Greek oligarchies had to equilibrium coercion with co-optation to keep their topics disordered and helpless. 

The book examines issues such as control of public space, the manipulation of management of info, and the creation of patron-client relatives, regularly citing parallels with current non-democratic regimes. Simonton also suggests changes over time in antiquity. 

Traditional Greek Oligarchy signifies a significant new development in studying the earliest government. It fills a long-lasting gap in our information about non-democratic government, although greatly enlightening our understanding of customs of power that continue to affect us nowadays.

Legal definition

Oligarchy means “rule by a few.” When mentioning administrations, it mentions administration by a few, generally the rich, for their benefit rather than the community good. The Greek philosopher Aristotle supposed, “For democracy is said to be the administration of the numerous, but what if the many are a gentleman of stuff and have the control in their hands. 

The actual difference between democracy and oligarchy is deficiency and means. The democrats think that, as they are equal, they must be similar in all aspects. At the same time, the oligarchs claim too much, which is more inequality underneath the indication that they are unequal. Those who incline more toward oligarchy are called nobilities, and those who slope more toward democracy constitutional administrations. 

Consequently, the latter is the safer of the two, for the superior the number, the greater the strong point, and when men are equivalent, they are satisfied. But the rich, if the administration provides them control, are apt to be impertinent and avaricious. The only stable government standard is equivalence rendering to proportion, and each man enjoys his own.”


The period “oligarch” originates from the earliest Greek oligarchic, meaning “the rule of the few.” The term was coined by the Russian deputy prime minister, Boris Nemtsov, who borrowed it from Vladimir Lenin’s book “Imperialism as the Highest period of Capitalism,” A Widespread Outline.

Russia’s wealthiest persons have vanished more than $38 billion in 2022 because of Western authorizations on Russia in return for the invasion of Ukraine. The top 10 Russian oligarchs contain an estimated net worth of $186 billion, corresponding to the marketplace cap of large publicly-traded businesses like McDonald’s and AMD.

Nonetheless, who is the Russian ultra-rich? Today, we use Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index data to show Russia’s unlikeliest persons and how much they’ve misplaced due to the war so far. The Russian ultra-rich are also among the significant owners of private jets and superyachts⁠, some of which are accomplishing snagged by law implementation as part of the sanctions designed to crack down on Russia. 

The fifth-richest man in Russia is Alisher Usmanov. He owns Dilbar, the most significant motor yacht globally by gross weight. The ship is 512-feet long and costs $800 million, employing 84 full-time team members. The Russian ultra-rich are also among the most prominent proprietors of private planes and superyachts. 

Alisher Usmanov, The fifth-richest man in Russia, is the owner of Dilbar, the largest motor yacht in the world by gross tonnage. The boat is 512-feet long and reportedly costs $800 million, employing 84 full-time crew members.

One of the greatest high-profile Russian billionaires, because of the extraordinary achievement of his football club Chelsea FC, Roman Abramovich, was authorized later than some others, probably because he is less clearly powerful than other Putin associates.

How powerful he is in the Kremlin is abundantly discussed. Some propose that Mr. Putin just tolerates him. Still, the U.K. believes the two are close. For example, Mr. Abramovich has prepared money out of the suggestion, being presented with profitable agreements for the FIFA 2018 World Cup in Russia. 

Mr. Abramovich powerfully rejects having close bonds to Mr. Putin or the Kremlin, but the U.K. portion of his assessed $12.4bn fortune is currently frozen. Before the U.K. authorizations were proclaimed, he put Chelsea up for sale for £3bn. His £150m house in London’s Kensington Palace Gardens in London was also supposedly up for auction.

Mr. Abramovich made his cash in the 1990s and was one of the innovative oligarchs throughout Boris Yeltsin’s presidency. His main break was purchasing the oil company Sibneft at a knockdown worth. His resources include the third-longest yacht in the world, Eclipse, which recently left the British Virgin Isles, heading east across the Atlantic. His other giant and luxurious yacht, Solaris, is in the Mediterranean Sea.

He was ongoing to extract from the U.K. in current years. In 2018 he decided not to put on to reintroduce his U.K. visa and has in its place been using his afresh assimilated Israeli permit to visit London. And though he used to go to each Chelsea home game, he was infrequently seen at Stamford Bridge – and currently, he is banned from ingoing the U.K.

Read also:History of Ukraine and Russia ; Genocide Definition

External resource: Wikipedia

This post is also available in: English Français (French) Español (Spanish) Dansk (Danish)